Boom!! Dr. Peter Breggin & Ginger Breggin for the WIN! Finally, this is being dealt with, the adults are IN THE HOUSE! Breggin is deep into enemy territory now! Exactly what I have been saying, Malone

FAILED to help society & the question is WHY? Breggin makes very solid points here; Malone, more than three years ago, knew that the mRNA technology was dangerous (ADE) but stayed silent! Why?

As I said before and IMO, something about the Malone show does not add up, maybe I am slow, but it stinks to high heavens. I, and others want him questioned properly and we do not want to hear about horses and barns and farms and mass formation and European trips. We want to talk about mRNA technology.

Dr. Breggin has it where it should be now. I see the good Dr. Malone now calls it ‘pseudo-mRNA vax’…hhhhmmm, I wonder if to try, and I say ‘try’ to distance himself for the death he and others brought. They brought death. He knows it. Breggin is over the target, he Malone has benefitted by not answering any questions. Malone has benefitted financially yet has not given the public what the public needed. Answers. From proper interrogation and under oath. Thus far.

And btw, Malone defamed me and my family on Twitter and I should sue him but will await him. He has attacked many good people like McCullough and even family. What Malone did to my family on Twitter caused an approach to the police to ensure that law enforcement knew for it resulted in threats on my family. However, that is not the issue here. Here were are investigating and talking science.

Malone must be made to answer about his role in this under oath, with proper questioning. And it will come!

Breggin:

‘As he became a public figure with considerable influence, he never drew professional or public attention to this scientific conclusion that the mRNA vaccines were literally unfit for human consumption, even experimentally. He never disclosed that he and his coauthor had proven this to their own satisfaction in their own laboratory research and in a review of the scientific literature.’

‘On February 2, 2023, Robert W. Malone, MD, finally called for a ban on mRNA and DNA COVID injections — years after many of us had come to the same conclusion.¹ But to our shock, we have now discovered that Malone, more than three years ago, had already scientifically proven and published that these COVID vaccinations with genetic mRNA and DNA were too dangerous for human consumption, even experimentally. He never made professional or public disclosures of this information. Meanwhile, the article remained in obscurity until we recently discovered it.’

This is very very important and he has to answer to this and many questions. I have argued if we call Fauci et al. under oath, we bring Malone under oath. He has benefitted for the public has given him money and support his substack etc. expecting at the least to tell us how to turn it off. Breggin is correct to raise these points. Yet we know now fully that he knew that the mRNA was very dangerous especially as to ADE. By his own work. Yet just benefitted. The person who ‘invented’ the mRNA has made money and benefitted from poor people seeking answers and hurt by the very same mRNA technology that he ‘invented’ and when you raise questions, he sues you for defamation. Imagine that. He has sued the Breggins for 25 million $ because they do not buy his junk. It is their right. It is America, the land of the free.

I have stated openly and this paper by Breggin proves my point and question: why was Malone silent on the lies by CDC that the gene injection stayed at the injection site? There are others lies that he has been silent on. Many died taking it believing the CDC. Why did Malone stay silent knowing the gene injection mRNA technology he said he invented, was so deadly? Why did he keep this hidden? Why was this report not central to his talks from January 2020 and why was he not declarative with this?

The public always only wanted answers on how to mitigate the risk from the shots. This remains lacking, leaving leaders like Foster Coulson and his Wellness Company and supporting experts like Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Richard Amerling, myself (Dr. Paul Alexander), Dr. Harvey Risch and Dr. Heather Gessling to put forth options. Yet Malone must know how to turn off the mRNA technology he created as he said, so why has he been silent and Dr. Breggin is over the target with the question and assertion he makes.

IMO, a massive opportunity has been missed and people have suffered! It is not too late for Malone to come clean and tell the public how to turn off the mRNA technology and to circumvent it’s deadly effects. It is time that very serious discussions be had with Dr. Malone. It is time, serious questions need to be answered.

Dr. Breggin:

‘On February 2, 2023, Robert W. Malone, MD, finally called for a ban on mRNA and DNA COVID injections — years after many of us had come to the same conclusion.¹ But to our shock, we have now discovered that Malone, more than three years ago, had already scientifically proven and published that these COVID vaccinations with genetic mRNA and DNA were too dangerous for human consumption, even experimentally. He never made professional or public disclosures of this information. Meanwhile, the article remained in obscurity until we recently discovered it.

In January 2020, Malone published on ResearchGate an elaborate scientific paper with MIT researcher Darrell O. Ricke as the first author in which the two concluded that all COVID-19 vaccines, including mRNA, were too deadly to be given even experimentally to humans.² The duo of Ricke and Malone followed this up by submitting the paper to Lancet, and the journal put the article up on its prepublication platform in March 2020.³ The article is still in place today online and has never, to our knowledge, been published in a fully peer-reviewed format.

As Malone became famous, especially among health freedom researchers and activists, he never mentioned the January and March 2020 online publications of the article. As he became a public figure with considerable influence, he never drew professional or public attention to this scientific conclusion that the mRNA vaccines were literally unfit for human consumption, even experimentally. He never disclosed that he and his coauthor had proven this to their own satisfaction in their own laboratory research and in a review of the scientific literature.’

SOURCE:

https://www.americaoutloud.com/category/blog/breggin/