Children's INNATE immunity (antibodies & NK cells) give initial protection against viral infection & peak viral replication is tamped down enough for the then virus-induced adaptive-adaptive response

by Paul Alexander

This prevents the host immune system from putting immune pressure on viral infectiousness (the spike); again, the issue is the MASS vaccination during the epidemic using a non-sterilizing vaccine

I am talking at a societal level, I am saying it is the innate immunity of children and young persons that is key to this pandemic ending. Herd immunity. Controversial you may say but let us think and read more and study this urgently. I am studying this extensively under Geert Vanden Bossche and am amazed at the potency of the INNATE compartment. His brilliance.

Children in the population are the cohort that has the greatest innate immune capacity and if we damage their innate immune defense this will lead to them being vulnerable to a range of pathogen, and not only to COVID disease, and this includes autoimmune disease.

Again, it is the innate Abs and likely the innate NK cells (natural killer) that can give sterilizing immunity and give the primary protection against viral infection and damaging it with vaccinal Abs can potentially overwhelm the subsequent acquired-adaptive response (natural immunity). The innate Abs also undergo ‘training’ and if we damage it, we can never ever get to herd immunity. It is a critical portion of natural immunity and often overlooked and not studied or understood, even by doctors.

I have grown to learn from GVB and am staggered how little medical doctors and even pediatricians know about the role of innate immunity (innate Abs) in SARS-CoV-2. These doctors are risking our children with these vaccines and can harm children’s immune response life-long. We can end up killing many children with these vaccines. This is not about waning antibodies, this is about deranging the immune system and irreparably. Devastating damage! We have misguided and uninformed doctors and pediatricians openly pushing the use of mRNA vaccines and these people seem absolutely ignorant about the critical role of innate immunity in fighting a broad range of infectious pathogen that include several respiratory viruses that cause acute self-limiting infection or disease. These doctors seem grossly unaware that the innate immune system is served by potent humoral and cellular effectors capable of preventing (innate Abs) or abrogating viral infection (NK cells).

Innate immunity is the key, the magnus opus, for the protection against productive infection and critical to sterilizing and herd immunity. GVB has explained to me that vaccinal, Spike-directed Abs of high affinity to the antigen can prevent binding of poly-specific innate Abs which have low affinity for the spike. Vaccinating children and then boosting them can result in elevated vaccinal Abs that will keep the innate immune system (innate Abs) of children suppressed continuously and thus continuously vulnerable.

This is how I understand this. What do you think? Is this plausible? We have to get our researchers and doctors knowledgeable on innate immunity and the role it plays, and I argue even more superior than the acquired-adaptive immune response (long-lived immunological memory). Its almost as if the innate as the first line soldiers are not there to do its work, to ‘take the edge off and dampen down viral load) then the 2nd line acquired will be overwhelmed. Again, what do you think? Does innate reign supreme? I say yes.

Update study by Seneff et al. raises additional questions on the vaccine’s role in subverting the innate immune response by causing impairment in type I interferon signaling:

“The mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were brought to market in response to the widely perceived public health crises of Covid-19. The utilization of mRNA vaccines in the context of infectious disease had no precedent, but desperate times seemed to call for desperate measures. The mRNA vaccines utilize genetically modified mRNA encoding spike proteins. These alterations hide the mRNA from cellular defenses, promote a longer biological half-life for the proteins, and provoke higher overall spike protein production. However, both experimental and observational evidence reveals a very different immune response to the vaccines compared to the response to infection with SARS-CoV-2. As we will show, the genetic modifications introduced by the vaccine are likely the source of these differential responses. In this paper, we present the evidence that vaccination, unlike natural infection, induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health. We explain the mechanism by which immune cells release into the circulation large quantities of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances are shown to have a potentially direct causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, increased tumorigenesis, and DNA damage. We show evidence from adverse event reports in the VAERS database supporting our hypothesis. We believe a comprehensive risk/benefit assessment of the mRNA vaccines excludes them as positive contributors to public health, even in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic.”