Did we damage the innate immune systems of our young children irreparably by vaccinating them and by vaccinating mothers? Did the COVID gene injection vaccination of expectant mothers transfer her
by Paul Alexander
vaccinal antibodies to the new born? Did those maternal vaccinal antibodies sideline and subvert (outcompeted) the child’s natural innate antibodies, in effect, hampering training and now e.g. RSV?
Vaccinating the expectant mother for COVID is the same as vaccinating the fetus, the newborn, and infant. The maternal COVID vaccinal antibodies will subvert the child’s innate immune system in a critical window of training and education.
Did the COVID gene injection vaccination of expectant mothers transfer her vaccinal antibodies to the new born? Did those maternal vaccinal antibodies sideline and subvert (outcompeted) the child’s natural innate antibodies from binding to virus (were they blocked from the binding sites by the antigen-specific vaccinal antibodies), in effect, sidelining them from binding to and training the innate immune system to recognize and handle (sterilize) the virus confronted with now and also to protect against a broad range of glycosylated viruses like RSV, measles, mumps etc.? Innate antibody binding that would allow for broadly protective training to other glycosylated viruses. Is this why we see RSV etc. escalating? Is it because of vaccinating the women/mothers and she transferred her vaccinal antibodies to the new born and this damaged innate antibody training of innate immune system (and natural killer cells (NK cells) training to recognize ‘self’ from ‘non-self’) and now children are at risk (especially to auto-immune diseases), especially this winter season to a broad range of pathogen, pathogen that could kill them when ordinarily a healthy functional innate immune system (and with natural innate antibody training) would have properly protected them?
Did this early transfer of maternal vaccinal antibodies (COVID) happen before they got their series of MMR etc. that would have protected them (via live attenuated vaccine)? So are we placing our 6 month, 9 month, 1 year olds etc. at risk by injecting them with the COVID gene injection before their innate immune systems had the chance to be trained or at the least gotten their series? So I am saying, either the child is being exposed to the ‘subverting’ COVID vaccinal antibodies passively from mother or actively via their own vaccination that the FDA etc. has criminally authorized in healthy children. GVB has made this point and I have given it thought and I think a real issue that can be catastrophic to healthy children. I think he is correct.
In short, the child must not get any COVID gene injection (I say no healthy child should under any condition get these COVID injections) yet if the parents are doing this, it should happen only after they have gotten their full series (prime and boost where needed) and/or been exposed to pathogen and their innate immune systems have been trained in handling the glycosylated pathogen. This training is broadly protective as these glycosylated viruses carry similar sugars, glycans etc. on their surfaces.
I am no virologist or vaccinologist but asking questions as I think of them?