Gazit et al. in August 2021 told us COVID naïve vaccinees had a 13.06 increased risk of infection compared to those prior infected; then why did the media, the medical establishment, CDC, NIH, FDA,
by Paul Alexander
PHAC, SAGE, Health Canada etc. disregard this key study that those with natural immunity (prior infection) had far greater protection than that conferred by the COVID mRNA technology vaccine?
‘an Israel retrospective observational study compared three groups: (1)SARS-CoV-2-naïve individuals who received a two-dose regimen of the BioNTech/Pfizer mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine, (2)previously infected individuals who have not been vaccinated, and (3)previously infected and single dose vaccinated individuals.’
Researchers found that ‘SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees had a 13.06-fold (95% CI, 8.08 to 21.11) increased risk for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant compared to those previously infected…
The increased risk was significant (P<0.001) for symptomatic disease as well. When allowing the infection to occur at any time before vaccination (from March 2020 to February 2021), evidence of waning natural immunity was demonstrated, though SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees had a 5.96-fold (95% CI, 4.85 to 7.33) increased risk for breakthrough infection and a 7.13-fold (95% CI, 5.51 to 9.21) increased risk for symptomatic disease. SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees were also at a greater risk for COVID-19-related-hospitalizations compared to those that were previously infected.’
‘This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the Pfizer BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity.’