Shrestha et al.'s study showed us there is no need for updating COVID booster shots whereby they showed that adults “not up-to-date” by the CDC definition have a lower risk of COVID-19 than those

by Paul Alexander

“up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination bringing into question value of this risk classification definition; why then are these crazy malfeasant vaccine makers pushing new vaccine using outdated spike?

Results COVID-19 occurred in 1475 (3%) of 48 344 employees during the 100-day study period. The cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was lower in the “not up-to-date” than in the “up-to-date” state. On multivariable analysis, not being “up-to-date” with COVID-19 vaccination was associated with lower risk of COVID-19 (HR, 0.77; 95% C.I., 0.69-0.86; P-value, <0.001). Results were very similar when those 65 years and older were only considered “up-to-date” after receiving 2 doses of the bivalent vaccine.

Conclusions Since the XBB lineages became dominant, adults “not up-to-date” by the CDC definition have a lower risk of COVID-19 than those “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination, bringing into question the value of this risk classification definition.

 

Summary Among 48 344 working-aged Cleveland Clinic employees, those not “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination had a lower risk of COVID-19 than those “up-to-date”. The current CDC definition provides a meaningless classification of risk of COVID-19 in the adult population.’

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.09.23290893v1.full