"The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" by Andersen et al.: The authors wrote "However, since we observed all notable SARS-CoV-2 features, including the optimized RBD and polybasic cleavage site,
by Paul Alexander
in related coronaviruses in nature, we do not believe that any type of laboratory based scenario is plausible."...This is key paper DECEIVING us that it was natural evolution 'spill-over', a FRAUD!
This NATURE publication (The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2) was the one document that set out to lie and deceive the world that it was a wet-market zoonotic ‘spillover’ due to evolutionary pressures and not man-made. It was a lie for the involved scientists all a few days before agreed that it was man-made in the lab. So they concocted a false narrative and conspired by writing this BS manuscript. Pure fabrication. NATURE, in all of it’s statue as a medical scientific journal, lost stature this day when it released this for NATURE editors etc. knew this was a lie.
All of the evidence points conclusively to a manufactured lab virus. The issue is was it deliberately released and by whom. Why? Why then?
This duplicitous NATURE publication above when we had this in 2015 (below) already published (involves Baric) and these very same folk were involved, where they are telling us in hubris that they have and are creating chimeric coronaviruses viruses with Gain of Function (furin cleavage site insertions) properties (infectious and lethal) and they are continuing to do it and that the vaccines do not work on it and it has epidemic pandemic potential…when you read this paper you understand what real hubris and malfeasance is all about:
