Think Twice, Three times & henceforth, before you decide to inject healthy American children with COVID gene injections; why? Because not one, (zero), no healthy child infected with COVID has died!

by Paul Alexander

Since the start of this COVID emergency; obese, severely overweight, serious underlying medical conditions is one aspect but healthy children? No! Consider them immune & already VACCINATED!

Leave our healthy children alone! Consider them already all vaccinated and immune!

In a recent Kaiser survey of parents following the recent FDA’s approval of the vaccine in children as young as 6 months old, parents responded by stating their reluctance due to “concerns about the newness of the vaccine and not enough testing or research, concerns over side effects, and worries over the overall safety of the vaccines.” In my opinion, this is very positive for parents are ‘getting’ it and are on top of the science more so than even our CDC, NIH, and FDA health officials. Estimates are that only 5% have opted to vaccinate their child and in my opinion, this was 5% too much.

Where do I begin?

Firstly, you resisted the COVID gene injections because you engaged in critical thinking. You resisted the pressure around you and it was great and many if not most of us lost lots. We lost family, friends, our liberty etc. It was and still is horrendous. But I guarantee you one thing, when you look back at your life, and your children’s and grandchildren’s, you will understand it was the greatest decision you ever made. You saved your life and theirs. You will come to learn. You fought it and fought them all, all the malfeasants in our governments and big business, all the Fauci et al.’s of this world, and you are a deep critical thinker, clear minded, special by what you did. Marvelous, unique, and powerful. You did not abdicate your own sense and reasoning for ex cathedra nonsensical, unscientific, and illogical authorities.

I am honored to be in this fight with you, most I do not know save but you being here. You are instinctive and knew just when you had to make a stand! Be proud, pat yourself on the back, and stay in the fight! Stay with me, help me spread the word, support us, help us contrarians, we will wage for you knowing you are behind us!

Secondly, the vaccine makers e.g. Pfizer and Moderna, as well as the CDC and FDA and NIH and all involved policy makers and health officials know one key fact, which is that these studies that underpin the vaccines were never conducted for the time needed to exclude harms. This is a key issue for if the studies do not run for a proper duration of follow-up, then you will not know the correct outcome. The duration of follow-up needed has been non-existent. Never done, and as such, we did not know, still do not know, and will not know whether these vaccines were ever ‘safe’ and ‘effective’. When they stopped the study early for ‘benefit’ (declaring success), this could have been at a ‘random high’ and had they gone to the planned sample size and longer duration, the benefit may/would have fallen away. That is the trick, stopping early for benefit. They declared success too early and is a trick these pharma and research malfeasants usually employ.

The vaccine makers and Fauci et al. also saw to it by giving vaccine to the placebo control group. The studies at that instant were in effect, over! We know it though, by what has happened around us with friends, colleagues, co-workers, and family, we know it is dangerous and does not work. But the point is, still today, the studies were all conducted fraudulently, IMO, to deceive. The FDA should hang it’s head in shame.

To start, the fact is that any rapid mass vaccination campaign as occurred for COVID, that uses a sub-optimal antigen-specific, non-neutralizing vaccine (such as the COVID vaccines) that does not sterilize the virus and with vaccination across all age groups, and into the pandemic (during an active ongoing pandemic of a highly mutating and highly infectious respiratory virus with high infectious pressure due to circulating virus) can only result in the generation of a continued series of new variants that are increasingly infectious, increasingly vaccine-resistant (due to viral “immune escape”), and inevitably more virulent (potentially lethal, deadly). 


In short, the mass vaccination campaign that has been implemented by our governments and their COVID advisors during the COVID pandemic (and which is not stopping with the new FDA EUAs for the bi-valent injections that are based on the legacy Wuhan strain and the BA.4/BA.5 variants) can potentially keep the pandemic going for many years with a potential more virulent sub-variant emerging. In other words, this pandemic will never come to a close if we keep inoculating with these non-sterilizing sub-optimal injections that do no stop infection, replication, or transmission.

Importantly, this vaccine implementation has been damaging the initiation of education and instruction (training) of the innate immune system, which is the first line of immune defense.  The side effects, harms, and deaths that have accrued due to the COVID injection itself have been horrendous and in part due to the vaccine makers not properly testing the vaccine for harms. Harms were never ‘excluded’ due to the small sample sizes, stopping early for benefit, and critically, not running the studies to the powered sample sizes as well as proper longer duration. The vaccine studies have never been carried out for durations that would definitively indicate their safety profile.

It is the damage and subversion to the natural innate immune system of children that concerns me and I have gained a deep appreciation and understanding of this critical aspect of natural immunity from Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche as well as Dr. Mike Yeadon. Parents must understand that when the COVID injection is given to young children (infants, children, younger persons), this prevents the child’s innate antibodies from eliminating the virus confronted with now, and prevents the active training and teaching of the innate immune effector cells on how to properly recognize (glycosylated) viruses and distinguish them from “self” antigens (i.e., distinguish between “self” and “non-self.”). That is, the child’s immune system will not be trained on what it should attack and eliminate versus what it should leave alone, given it belongs to the child.

Moreover, the innate immune system will not be properly trained on how to handle a broad range of pathogen the child will confront in the environment as the child gets older. Thus the training of the innate antibodies and innate immune system educates the immune response on pathogen confronted at present e.g. COVID virus, pathogen to be confronted in the future, and the differentiation of ‘self’ versus ‘non-self’ components as well as all the variations in-between e.g. ‘self-like’, ‘self-mimicking’ etc. given the virus uses components of the self to trick the immune system. It can take on the appearance of the self to evade the immune system. Therefore, it is a critical education that mitigates vulnerability to auto-immune disease.

This is a critical window of innate immunity training in early childhood development and for any immune system to learn at an early stage of life (once passive maternal immune protection is no longer available e.g. at about 4 to 6 months) so as to provide for a healthy and appropriate immune response especially in the future. This interference with the initiating foundational education of a child’s developing innate immune system can cause a COVID-vaccinated child to be less capable of handling glycosylated viruses (and glycosylated pathogens in general). This predisposes such children to immune pathology (e.g., autoimmune disease). Moreover, such children will be at risk of serious illness from a broad range of pathogen and not only glycosylated viruses. We are seeing a range of illnesses now in children in the era of COVID vaccination and we argue that it can be explained in part by damage to and subversion of the immune system itself (e.g. damage to the natural immunity).

Substack Alexander COVID News evidence-based medicine
BREAKING: NEJM study as a clear example of the COVID gene injection vaccine subverting, damaging established natural immunity in prior infected (COVID-recovered) children (Dan-Yu Lin et al.)
Is this why Geert Vanden Bossche was right when he said Africa will win this insane COVID injection madness by not vaccinating their children, or at least allowing time for their innate antibodies to train their innate immune systems? Is this why African nations have fared so well against COVID and especially omicron BA.5 clade in terms of infection/cas…
Read more

The issue is that the COVID gene injection induces antigen-specific vaccinal antibodies that are highly specific to the target antigen and they can potentially outcompete and sideline the innate antibodies from their binding to viruses and thus the training of the innate immune system. By the vaccinal antibodies binding to the antigen (e.g. receptor binding domain, N-terminal domain and other binding sites etc.), this blocks the innate antibodies from binding and as such it’s capacity to clear out the virus. This can render the child’s immune system sub-optimal and dysfunctional, and as such the child will be very vulnerable to pathogen and pathology.

Parents have to understand that in America, since the start of the pandemic, not one child, not one healthy child has gotten COVID infection and died from it. Not one. Parent have to also know that seasonal influenza, from the very start of this pandemic, was known to be far more dangerous to children than COVID. It was so February 2020 and remains so today.

Dr. Marty Makary’s research team (Johns Hopkins) showed this conclusively (Johns Hopkins and FAIR health study SOURCE utilized near one half of the US’s health insurance data). They found that 100% of pediatric COVID-19 deaths were in children with a pre-existing condition (chronic severe health condition).

Their study showed that not one healthy child died from COVID across the pandemic in the United States.

What does this suggest to you as a parent? Well, it shows what I and others have argued for 2.5 years now that children have basically zero risk. It shows that based on proper risk-benefit calculations, children absolutely do not need these injections (I argue no child) yet parents may consider vaccinating their high risk child who has serious comorbidities (with chronic severe health conditions, or immunocompromised children). This can be a consideration in instances of severe overweight or obesity on children. This should be done case-by-case and is not the same as mandating vaccines carte blanche across the board for all age-groups and certainly not in any healthy child given their near statistical zero risk of severe outcome if COVID infected. Certainly given that the vaccine has been shown to be harmful e.g. myocarditis, pericarditis, blood clots, bleeding etc.

Recall that Marshall et al. reported on “7 cases of acute myocarditis or myopericarditis in healthy male adolescents who presented with chest pain all within 4 days after the second dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination”.

So why would a parent inject their healthy child or even healthy teenagers with these COVID injections? There is no basis. None! Even the MIS-C new cases (potentially linked to COVID) as Makary reported, has declined decreased to zero. “And this week, a CDC report on child hospitalizations for COVID-19 in March and April, 2021 found zero deaths in the entire cohort of children studied.”

An important opinion written by pediatricians that may be one year old now but is very seminal and applicable, as they wrote “As pediatricians, we say please don’t use precious coronavirus vaccines on healthy children”. Makary has pointed to this seminal piece by Malley and Finn, where the authors are importantly pointing to the need of safety first before being offered. “The universal vaccination of healthy children 2 to 11 years old simply shouldn’t be a priority and may ultimately prove unnecessary. The relatively small group of children at risk because of underlying medical conditions should of course be offered the coronavirus vaccines, once they have been established as safe and effective for that age group.”

Let me end by reminding you of the seminal paper by Turner et al. published in NATURE (one year ago) showing us that natural immunity based on prior infection is life-long, ‘SARS-CoV-2 infection induces long-lived bone marrow plasma cells in humans’. My argument is that our children are largely immune, and we must leave them alone with this COVID gene injection. Even the CDC has reported in February 2022 (MMWR) that the immunity in children was approximately 75% to 80%, yet at this time, it is near 100% (CDC report finds 75 percent of children and teens had Covid by February).

We also knew that long-lived bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs) provided robust protection. We always knew this (see 1,2,3,4,5,6,7). We also knew that once COVID-recovered, you were at significantly lower risk of re-infection with COVID virus and that the virus had to be appreciably different (substantially mutated on the target antigen) to breach immunity (see 8,9,10). Omicron is highly infection (e.g. BA.4 and BA.5 clades) and presents as a nearly different (sufficiently different) virus given the multiple mutations on the spike protein to present the immune system with a rechallenge and a potential breach. However, the predominant symptoms are mild akin to a common cold.

We know of the robust (seminal) study by Shrestha et al. that looked at employees of the Cleveland Health System, who reported that “not one of the 1359 previously infected subjects who remained unvaccinated had a SARS-CoV-2 infection over the duration of the study.” This was another seminal study that was covered up and not mainstreamed by the legacy media e.g. CNN etc. for it showed that natural COVID recovered immunity was robust, and called into question vaccinating COVID-recovered persons. Same here for our children who are immune. These potent studies published in 2020 and 2021 were disregarded by the legacy media, the CDC, NIH, and FDA as the deceptive narrative was spun on the inferiority of natural immunity to vaccinal immunity. Yet they all knew better than that, they all knew they were being duplicitous and misleading to the general public to force vaccine. They were lying!

We also know that natural immunity (innate and acquired-adaptive) can last 100 years (Yu et al.: Neutralizing antibodies derived from the B cells of 1918 influenza pandemic survivors“here we show that of the 32 individuals tested that were born in or before 1915, each showed sero-reactivity with the 1918 virus, nearly 90 years after the pandemic.”) and if our children are now immune from near certain prior exposure to COVID virus, infection, and recovery (were largely asymptomatic), then leave them alone with these gene injections.

In closing, are children at risk for COVID that would warrant a vaccine?

Well, let me conclude by reminding you that the infection mortality rate (IFR) is (and has remained) roughly similar (or likely lower once all infection data are collected) to seasonal influenza. Stanford’s John P.A. Ioannidis identified 36 studies (43 estimates) along with an additional 7 preliminary national estimates (50 pieces of data) and concluded that among people <70 years old across the world, infection fatality rates ranged from 0.00% to 0.57% with a median of 0.05% across the different global locations (with a corrected median of 0.04%). Survival for those under 70 years is 99.5% (Ioannidis update). Moreover, with a focus on children, “The estimated IFR is close to zero for children and young adults.” The global data is unequivocal that “deaths from Covid are incredibly rare” in children.

The published evidence is conclusive that the risk of severe illness or death from Covid-19 in children is almost nil (statistical zero) and this evidence has accumulated for well over a year now; in fact we knew this for over 18 months. It is clear that children are at very low risk of spreading the infection to other children, of spreading to adults as seen in household transmission studies, or of taking it home or becoming ill, or dying, and this is settled scientific global evidence. Children are less at risk of developing severe illness courses, and also are far less susceptible and likely to spread and drive SARS-CoV-2 (references 1234). This implies that any mass injection/inoculation or even clinical trials on children with such near zero risk of spread and illness/death is contraindicated, unethical, and potentially associated with significant harm.

I would also add material (see 6 pieces of evidence below) I published in Brownstone (Jeff Tucker’s publication) prior, asking Pfizer to leave our children alone. The reality is that children are not candidates for the COVID vaccines (see evidence here and here) and may well be (are) immune and can be considered “fully vaccinated.”

Is there more evidence I wish to table in my clarion call to you parents? Yes there is:

1.) The virus uses the ACE 2 receptor to gain entry to the host cell, and the ACE 2 receptor has limited (less) expression and presence in the nasal epithelium in young children (potentially in upper respiratory airways); this partly explains why children are less likely to be infected in the first place, or spread it to other children or adults, or even get severely ill; the biological molecular apparatus is simply not there in the nasopharynx of children as reported eloquently by Patel and Bunyavanich. By bypassing this natural protection (limited nasal ACE 2 receptors in young children) and entering the shoulder deltoid, this could release vaccine, its mRNA and LNP content (e.g. PEG), and generated spike into the circulation that could then damage the endothelial lining of the blood vessels (vasculature) and cause severe allergic reactions (e.g. hereherehereherehere).

2) Research (August 2021) by Loske deepened our understanding of this natural type biological/molecular protection even further by showing that pre-activated (primed) antiviral innate immunity in the upper airways of children work to control early SARS-CoV-2 infection…resulting in a stronger early innate antiviral response to SARS-CoV-2 infection than in adults.”

3) When one is vaccinated or gets infected naturally, this drives the formation, tissue distribution, and clonal evolution of B cells which is key to encoding humoral immune memory. There is research evidence by Yang published in Science (May 2021) that blood examined from children retrieved prior to Covid-19 pandemic have memory B cells that can bind to SARS-CoV-2, suggestive of the potent role of early childhood exposure to common cold coronaviruses (coronaviruses). This is supported by Mateus et al. who reported on T cell memory to prior coronaviruses that cause the common cold (cross-reactivity/cross-protection). 

4) Weisberg and Farber et al. suggested (and building on research work by Kumar and Faber) that the reason children can more easily neutralize the virus is that their T cells are relatively naïve. They argue that since children’s T cells are mostly untrained, they can thus immunologically respond more rapidly and nimbly to novel viruses.

5)A Yale University report (Yale and Albert Einstein College of Medicine report Sept. 18, 2020 in the journal Science Translational Medicine) indicated that children and adults display very diverse and different immune system responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection which helps understanding why they have far less illness or mortality from COVID. “Since the earliest days of the COVID-19 outbreak, scientists have observed that children infected with the virus tend to fare much better than adults…researchers reported that levels of two immune system molecules — interleukin 17A (IL-17A), which helps mobilize immune system response during early infection, and interferon gamma (INF-g), which combats viral replication — were strongly linked to the age of the patients. The younger the patient, the higher the levels of IL-17A and INF-g, the analysis showed…these two molecules are part of the innate immune system, a more primitive, non-specific type of response activated early after infection.”

6) Dowell et al. (2022) published and commented on antibody and cellular immunity in children (aged 3-11 years) and adults. Their findings confirm a biological basis for why SARS-CoV-2 infection is generally mild or asymptomatic in children. They reported that antibody responses against spike protein were elevated in children and seroconversion “boosted responses against seasonal Beta-coronaviruses through cross-recognition of the S2 domain. Neutralization of viral variants was comparable between children and adults. Spike-specific T cell responses were more than twice as high in children and were also detected in many seronegative children, indicating pre-existing cross-reactive responses to seasonal coronaviruses.” Very key in the findings were that children maintained and preserved “antibody and cellular responses 6 months after infection, whereas relative waning occurred in adults. Spike-specific responses were also broadly stable beyond 12 months. Therefore, children generate robust, cross-reactive and sustained immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 with focused specificity for the spike protein.”

What can be concluded? Pulling these emerging research findings together strengthens the case that children are not candidates for the COVID vaccines and are to be considered already “fully and completely COVID-vaccinated.” Furthermore, as lucidly outlined by Whelan, it is potentially disastrous to children if we move forward with vaccines without proper study of the possible harms to them. Vaccine developers failed to conduct the proper safety studies and for the duration that would unravel any harms. 

To end, is the COVID injection a consideration for a child who has underlying medical conditions or is obese or immunocompromised? Maybe, and this is a risk management decision parents must make with their doctor. Case by case I argue. Yet there should be no mandate and no healthy child should be in receipt of these injections, none! There is no basis as the risk is near zero. There is no case made that justifies these COVID injections for healthy children. No one has made the case, no CDC, no NIH, no FDA, no Fauci, no Francis Collins, no Walensky, no Bourla, no Bancel, no one!

Leave the children alone and the recent FDA approval (and CDC rubber-stamp) of the gene injection in children 6 months old to 5 years was a catastrophic mistake, not only because there was no evidence to support this, but because the evidence put forth by the vaccine makers was ludicrously thin and non-existent. The FDA should hang it’s head in shame for this EUA approval. The FDA is actually acting very recklessly and dangerously.