vaxx SHEDDING is REAL? seems so (Kedl), & the uncertainty about vaccine shedding etc. is being clarified now as 'VERY LIKELY' in "Evidence for Aerosol Transfer of SARS-CoV2-specific Humoral Immunity"
by Paul Alexander
SEEMS THE ISSUE OF VACCINE SHEDDING is not overblown or nonsensical, turns out it is credible...parents who are vaxxed are shedding vax particles to the children?? this is shocking; put a pin in it!
I start by saying this is a very fascinating study. Simple, small and has to be replicated and studied further to be definitive on vaccine shedding. However this study raises many serious issues yet hold on before calling home to parents, deep breaths, deep breaths…not just yet as we need more study but this is eye opening and adds another piece to the puzzle. Lee suggests we do not get too excited, I agree fully but we put a pin in this study…we put a pin…we shall circle back but lets take a quick look.
A key statement by researchers is this ‘passive immunity’ transfer is a benefit. They write “Our results suggest that aerosol transmission of antibodies may also contribute to host protection and represent an entirely unrecognized mechanism by which passive immune protection may be communicated.”
But I say NOT SO, how can the shedding of vaccine particles and antibodies be a benefit when the recipient (or the vaccinated person) did not ask for it or know this, nor is the vaccine approved…? We are shedding unapproved dangerous products and this is a good thing? Pfizer and Moderna et al. never studied this and the FDA did not demand they do. Again, a failure by FDA to protect us. This is idiotic by these researchers and very dangerous. They are trying to take a shocking very dangerous finding and make it into a benefit.
“Respiratory transmission of viral infection is proof that oral/nasal cavity constituents can be communicated through aerosols and/or respiratory droplets. As such, it would stand to reason that antibody present within the oral/nasal environment may also be aerosolized to some degree…
The extended mandates for mask wearing in both social and work environments provided a unique opportunity to evaluate the possibility of aerosolized antibody expiration from vaccinated individuals…
we identified anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies eluted from surgical face masks worn by vaccinated lab members donated at the end of one workday. Consistent with the results reported by others, we identified both IgG and IgA in saliva from vaccinated individuals…
Given these observations, we hypothesized that droplet/aerosolized antibody transfer might occur between individuals, much like droplet/aerosolized virus particles can be exchanged by the same route…
Initial comparison of nasal swabs acquired from children living in vaccinated households revealed readily detectable SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG, especially when compared to the complete deficit of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody detected in the few nasal swabs we obtained from children in nonvaccinated households…
Evaluation of samples in this fashion revealed that high intranasal IgG in vaccinated parents was significantly associated (p-value = 0.01) with a 0.38 increase in the log transformed intranasal IgG gMFIs within a child from the same household…”
All this to say that we have to study more and fast. For 2 questions emerge from this study:
i)did the kids get the intranasal IgG from the droplets from saliva so this is why detected in the masks originally? It could be that simple and the reason…OR
ii) it is also possible and even likely that the kids get the intranasal IgG due to the content of the vaccine being shed, and entering their noses and oral cavities and driving a full blown immune response in the kids. It could be that the vaccine content is being shed and the kids are reacting with an authentic immune response.
So let us examine this more in further study but very interesting and I do not think this is a benefit. This is catastrophic IMO.