Dr. Fauci admits the vaccine fails; he lies about the COVID injection preventing severe illness, he lies that this virus causes infection, NO, it is the non-neutralizing vaccine causing the infections

by Paul Alexander

July 14, 2022

in vaxxed; he says take vaccine that is causing the infection as this is what this non-neutralizing vaccine does so that it protects severe illness? does this make sense? should you just not take?

When people like him say it reduces severe illness, I need to see the evidence of this. He is openly lying to the people. Certainly, no study has shown this, no pharma study. None. I am yet to see data and not because this Horseman says it, makes it so. What we do know is the vaccine causes the vaccinated to get infected, PERIOD! We have data and evidence of this. So here he is basically admitting the vaccine does not work. Yet he is saying take it as it gets you infected but will stop severe illness. What a dolt! The remedy is NOT to take it! Stop taking it. Oh, I get it, he pretends, it’s the virus causing infections and is more transmissible, not the vaccine making the virus more infectious and transmissible to the vaccinated. He knows this, but he is misleading the nation and harming people. I hope he knows this, yikes if he does not! But he has to well understand what a non-sterilizing vaccine does based on natural selection due to non-neutralizing sub-optimal immune pressure on the target antigen, and as we see with COVID and omicron etc., the then selection of and emergence of infectious variants. He must see what is happening.

Maybe for Fauci, I will include 3 studies here for him and his inept doltish team to read to come up on things to understand what is happening with this non-neutralizing vaccine. Maybe he will understand finally! If you know him, please ensure he gets these. Thanks.

DR. FAUCI: One of the things that's clear from the data [is] that even though vaccines - because of the high degree of transmissibility of this virus - don't protect overly well, as it were, against infection, they protect quite well against severe disease leading to hospitalization and death. And I believe that's the reason, Neil, why at my age, being vaccinated and boosted, even though it didn't protect me against infection, I feel confident that it made a major role in protecting me from progressing to severe disease. And that's very likely why I had a relatively mild course. So my message to people who seem confused because people who are vaccinated get infected - the answer is if you weren't vaccinated, the likelihood [is] you would have had [a] more severe course than you did have when you were vaccinated.

Three studies for Dr. Fauci to read and hopefully will inform him:

1)Liu et al.: An infectivity-enhancing site on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein targeted by antibodies

Key statement:

‘found that some of antibodies against the N-terminal domain (NTD) induced the open conformation of RBD and thus enhanced the binding capacity of the spike protein to ACE2 and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2. Mutational analysis revealed that all of the infectivity-enhancing antibodies recognized a specific site on the NTD. Structural analysis demonstrated that all infectivity-enhancing antibodies bound to NTD in a similar manner. The antibodies against this infectivity-enhancing site were detected at high levels in severe patients.’

2)Yahi et al.: Infection-enhancing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies recognize both the original Wuhan/D614G strain and Delta variants. A potential risk for mass vaccination?

‘We show that enhancing antibodies have a higher affinity for Delta variants than for Wuhan/D614G NTDs. We show that enhancing antibodies reinforce the binding of the spike trimer to the host cell membrane by clamping the NTD to lipid raft microdomains. This stabilizing mechanism may facilitate the conformational change that induces the demasking of the receptor binding domain. As the NTD is also targeted by neutralizing antibodies, our data suggest that the balance between neutralizing and facilitating antibodies in vaccinated individuals is in favor of neutralization for the original Wuhan/D614G strain. However, in the case of the Delta variant, neutralizing antibodies have a decreased affinity for the spike protein, whereas facilitating antibodies display a strikingly increased affinity. Thus, ADE may be a concern for people receiving vaccines based on the original Wuhan strain spike sequence (either mRNA or viral vectors).’

3)Van Egeren et al.: “Risk of rapid evolutionary escape from biomedical interventions targeting SARS-CoV-2 spike protein”

‘Our modeling suggests that SARS-CoV-2 mutants with one or two mildly deleterious mutations are expected to exist in high numbers due to neutral genetic variation, and consequently resistance to vaccines or other prophylactics that rely on one or two antibodies for protection can develop quickly -and repeatedly- under positive selection. Predicted resistance timelines are comparable to those of the decay kinetics of nAbs raised against vaccinal or natural antigens, raising a second potential mechanism for loss of immunity in the population.’

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/fauci-admits-that-covid-19-vaccines-do-not-protect-overly-well-against-infection/ar-AAZvCn8?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=77937b3a07ec496bb4cb8f01d93c8cea