'The die is cast': CDC MEETING OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES on October 19th & 20th 2022; parents must say NO to these injections in their statistical zero risk children; say NO!

by Paul Alexander

Parents must respond by this insanity by getting none of their children injected, healthy children DO NOT need these COVID injections, it confers no benefit, Ioannidis reminded us, 0.0003% risk death

Seems the die is cast, CDC intends to ‘in your face’, despite the near zero risk and harms from the COVID shots, add the COVID injections to the childhood immunization schedule. All to ensure protection. Liability protection for the vaccine makers and themselves for once it is on the immunization schedule, they are absolved should your child die due to the vaccine.

It may well be a move by the CDDC malfeasants to place the COVID gene injections onto the children immunization schedule. See highlighted area below.

We said before, and people like Robert Kennedy jr. was lead in cuing us to the fact that the vaccine makers now face mounting harms and deaths from the shots and this is why the emergency declaration was extended. The liability protection given wrongfully by Azar in February March 2020 protects them. Only the vaccinee was exposed.

Going onto the vaccine schedule, the childhood immunization schedule will protect them the vaccine maker Bourla and Bancel and all involved with this disaster, for you will know, parents in America will not take what is happening sitting down. They will get their pitchforks and seek Bourla and Bancel for immediate discussions should their normally healthy child die from the shots. And let me be as clear as I can be, children will die from these shots. Will be harmed. Not may, they ‘will’. Even if one. As you see now in adults. Direct impact, derangement of the innate immune system etc. Myocarditis, pericarditis, auto-immune disease given the subversion of the innate immune system from being properly trained due to the high-affinity, antigen-specific vaccinal antibodies for the spike antigen. The proper training of the innate immune system by the innate antibodies will be subverted once the maternal antibodies wane and the child gets the shot.


“For 29 countries (24 high-income, 5 others)…the infection fatality rate (IFRs) had a median of 0.035% (interquartile range (IQR) 0.013 - 0.056%) for the 0-59 years old population, and 0.095% (IQR 0.036 - 0.125%,) for the 0-69 years old.

The median IFR was 0.0003% at 0-19 years, 0.003% at 20-29 years, 0.011% at 30-39 years, 0.035% at 40-49 years, 0.129% at 50-59 years, and 0.501% at 60-69 years. Including data from another 9 countries with imputed age distribution of COVID-19 deaths yielded median IFR of 0.025-0.032% for 0-59 years and 0.063-0.082% for 0-69 years. Meta-regression analyses also suggested global IFR of 0.03% and 0.07%, respectively in these age groups.

Median IFRs show a clear age-gradient with approximately 3-4-fold increase for each decade but it starts from as low as 0.0003% among children and adolescents.

Conclusion: The current comprehensive systematic evaluation of national seroprevalence studies suggests that the IFR of COVID-19 among non-elderly populations in the pre-vaccination era is substantially lower than previously calculated (4-8,59), especially in the younger age strata.’

Substack Alexander COVID News evidence-based medicine
BOOM! Stanford's John Ioannidis proves AGAIN what I, Risch, McCullough, Atlas, J Tucker, Tenenbaum, Bhattacharya, Gupta, Kulldorff, Wolf, Oskoui knew, COVID was NOT deadly for vast majority, low IFR
Two years ago I wrote this in AIER (under Tucker and Eastman) with Risch and Tenenbaum and Dara and McCullough and Oskoui, working with Ioannidis and his data, listening, sharing, we knew the risk was near zero. For the younger, healthy, well, even middle-aged persons. No one ever said that this was not serious for the elderly and high risk who we call …
Read more